Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of inhaled pirfenidone (AP01) versus placebo on top of standard of care in participants with PPF over 52 weeks.

null

Conditions de participation

  • Sexe:

    ALL
  • Âges admissibles:

    18 and up

Critères de participation

Inclusion Criteria:

* Participant meets criteria for PPF, as follows:
* In subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) of known or unknown etiology other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who have radiological evidence of pulmonary fibrosis, PPF is defined as:

Physiological evidence of disease progression with at least 1 of the following criteria despite treatment with approved or unapproved medications commonly used in practice (per Investigator):

1. Relative decline in FVC ≥10% predicted within the previous 24 months compared to Screening Visit 1
2. Relative decline in FVC ≥5 to \<10% predicted within the previous 24 months compared to Screening Visit 1 with at least 1 of the 2 following criteria:

* Worsening respiratory symptoms (Note: Changes attributable to comorbidities e.g., infection, heart failure must be excluded) OR
* Radiological (HRCT) evidence of disease progression per a local or central radiologist, for example:

* Increased extent or severity of traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis
* New ground-glass opacity with traction bronchiectasis
* New fine reticulation
* Increased extent or increased coarseness of reticular abnormality
* New or increased honeycombing
* Increased lobar volume loss
3. Worsening of respiratory symptoms (Note: Changes attributable to comorbidities e.g., infection, heart failure must be excluded) AND radiological (HRCT) evidence of disease progression per a local or central radiologist

* Meeting all of the following criteria during the Screening Period:

a. FVC ≥45% of predicted normal at Screening Visit 1, b. Forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1)/FVC ≥0.7 or ≥age-adjusted lower limit of normal at Screening Visit 1, c. Diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥30% of predicted, corrected for hemoglobin at Screening Visit 1, d. Acceptability: Participants can perform acceptable spirometry (i.e., meet American Thoracic Society (ATS)/ European Respiratory Society (ERS) acceptability criteria at both Screening Visits).

• For subjects already on nintedanib (up to 30% of subjects): Must have been on nintedanib for at least 6 months prior to Screening with or without dose adjustments and/or drug interruptions during that period. For subjects who have discontinued nintedanib prior to Screening: Must have been off of nintedanib for a minimum of 12 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Current treatment with oral pirfenidone or treatment with oral pirfenidone within 3 months prior to Screening.
* Elevated liver enzymes and liver injury at Screening defined as:

1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ˃ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
2. Bilirubin \>2.0 x ULN
* Renal disease with a creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min, calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula. Retesting is allowed once.
* Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) based on the ATS diagnostic algorithm for IPF. UIP that is not idiopathic, for example related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), familial interstitial lung disease (ILD), or other is not exclusionary.
* Greater extent of emphysema than of fibrotic ILD on HRCT. Note: CT results must be confirmed through the central over read process.
* Significant clinical worsening of PPF between Screening
* Participants who cannot meet protocol-specified Baseline stability criteria. FVC Baseline stability is defined as the FVC assessments at Visit 3 being within ±12% of the mean of the FVC assessments obtained at the 2 preceding visits. At Visit 3, if the pre-dose FVC is outside of ±12% range, the participant will not be randomized and will be considered a screen failure.

Lieu de l'étude

Dynamic Drug Advancement
Dynamic Drug Advancement
Ajax, Ontario
Canada

Contactez l'équipe d'étude

Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada

Contactez l'équipe d'étude

CIC Mauricie
CIC Mauricie
Trois-Rivières, Quebec
Canada

Contactez l'équipe d'étude

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario
Canada

Contactez l'équipe d'étude

Research Institute McGill University Health Center
Research Institute McGill University Health Center
Montreal, Quebec
Canada

Contactez l'équipe d'étude

Étude parrainée par
Avalyn Pharma Inc.
Participants recherchés
Plus d'informations
ID de l'étude: NCT06329401